Termed the ‘black widow,’ 51 year old Tami Duvall of Indianapolis has been accused of murdering her husband. Her motive: cashing in her husband’s $100,000 life insurance policy.

Alan Duvall, 61, died at his home in Columbus back in 2007 and the cause of death was initially determined to be alcohol poisoning. Tami Duvall confirmed these findings, stating that she believed he had ‘drunk himself to death.’ But Mr. Duvall’s blood also had a high level of morphine in it at the time of death – around 82 times the recommended therapeutic level.

Increasing Suspicion from Life Insurance Company and Victim’s Family

The presence of drugs in his system made Mr. Duvall’s family suspicious: Duval’s stepbrother stated that Alan Duvall enjoyed his drink but strictly abhorred the use of drugs – he told the Republic newspaper that “if someone walked in his house and had drugs, he would throw them out.”

Working at a local nursing home, Tami Duvall would have easy access to certain drugs such as morphine, which killed her husband. Prosecutors affirm that the cause of death was drugs which were placed in Alan. Duvall’s food by Tami Duvall on the night he died.

Life Insurance Policy Worth $100,000 Believed to be the Motive

The prosecution reported that just a month prior to his death Tami Duvall persuaded her husband to take out a life insurance policy of $100,000 naming her as the beneficiary, even though she had recently told friends that she intended to divorce her husband.

Duvall Anxious to have Life Insurance Payout Released

Tami Duvall began acting suspiciously after her husband’s death; she became anxious to get the body cremated as quickly as possible and asked investigators several times how much longer they were going to take since she needed to collect on a life insurance policy.

Tami Duvall later changed her statement to police about what happened the night of her husband’s death. She stated that Alan Duvall had taken the morphine himself in order to commit suicide.

Tami Duvall has been charged with murder, insurance fraud and obstruction of justice. A plea of ‘not guilty’ has been entered for her at a preliminary hearing and the trial date is set for January 2011.

Source: Chicago Tribune August 2010

A woman from Kazakhstan is believed to have just reached her 130^th birthday – which makes her more than 16 years older than the world’s other longest-lived person. Sakhan Dosova, mother to ten children, says she has never seen a doctor, doesn’t eat sweets, and loves cottage cheese – she believes that the reason she has lived so long is down to her sense of humour. Her grand-daughter, Gaukhar Kaniewva, 42, agreed “She is a very cheerful woman. We think laughter and her good mood helped her live so long.”

(more…)

A recent study suggests that poverty contributes to decreased life expectancy. This makes a life insurance policy all the more vital to families with limited incomes.

It may not come as a complete surprise to be told that well-off people tend to live longer than poor; unemployment, poor diet, and lack of leisure time play a part in increasing stress and decreasing quality of life for low earners. What is startling however is just how big a life expectancy gap there may be between the two groups.

Income Inequality Results in a Life Expectancy Differences

Researchers at Statistics Canada recently attempted to analyze the effect  poverty vs. affluence or ‘income disparity’ has on life expectancy. The findings, based on data gathered in Canada, were published recently in the journal Health Reports and make for disquieting reading: Figures show that on average only 54% of men from the lowest income group (bottom 10%) have a life expectancy of 75 years of age, compared with 74% of top earners. For women, 69.4.% of the least well-off can be expected to reach the age of 75, as opposed to 84.4% of the wealthiest women.

(more…)

Regulators are hot on the trail of insurance agents who dealt in ’stranger-originated’ life insurance policies (known as STOLIs or Life Settlement plans) whereby seniors, often people in their 70’s, were encouraged to take out life insurance policies which were then sold on to investment companies; the investors took over the premiums, and would receive the lump sum paid out on the original policyholders death. Cash-strapped elderly clients were often attracted by the promise of an early payout from the sale of the policies.

Dubious Ethics Not an Issue for Insurance Agents or Investors

Regulators were startled by the huge rise in the number of ’stranger-originated’ policies being sold in this way – between the years of 2004 and 2008 it became a billion-dollar industry. Although the agents often set up the deals at huge financial gain to themselves, it has to be noted that investors were happy to climb on the bandwagon.

Despite only narrowly skirting the “insurable interest law” which prohibits a third party owning an insurance policy when they could have no conceivable interest in the well-being of the person holding it – (far from it in fact), the practice was legal across quite a few states until recently.

A bar graph showing the growth in life settlement policies.

Insurers File Civil Actions against Agents for Life Settlement Policies

Insurance companies claim insurance agents misrepresented their clients’ assets when looking to purchase life insurance policies for them, with many committing acts of outright fraud when filling in the application forms. According to them, in an attempt to secure policies, over eager agents, fueled by greed, inflated the estimated wealth of their clients and fraudulently answered ‘no’ when asked if they had any plans to sell the policies on.

For this reason insurers such as AXA have voided many of these insurance policies, leaving investors with now-worthless investments – unsurprisingly they are also suing the brokers for compensation.

Wealthy Insurance Agent in Trouble for Life Plan Fraud

One insurance agent being pursued in a high profile case, is Steven M Brasner, accused of committing grand theft and fraud when acting as the middleman in securing $78 million worth of insurance policies, netting him over $2 million in commission.

An illustration of the life insurance securitization process, which is complicated and similar to mortgage securitization.

He is charged with lying on his clients’ application forms in order to secure life insurance policies for them.  As well as facing state prosecution Mr Brasner is also being pursued through the civil courts by the insurance companies and investors he dealt with.  Mr Brasner is believed to have inflated his client’s net worth sometimes by up to six times in order to secure business. Steven Brasner is just one among many agents who are being pursued – there are over 200 civil lawsuits pending, filed by insurers. Judge John Meyer noted that the level of fraud was ‘astounding.’

Mr Brasner has declared himself innocent of all charges. He is quoted as saying that the companies he dealt with such as the investment group G111 Accumulation Trust (part of Deutsche Bank) were culpable and ‘had the expertise’ to ‘conduct due diligence’ prior to buying ownership risks.

More Information

See the New York Times article on Life Settlement Securitization here

photo credit: VoisineN

Millions of Americans give their financial support to charitable organizations every year. In addition to donating to good causes during their lifetimes, there are ways for the philanthropic to continue to help a charity of choice, even after death. In fact, any type of life insurance can be altered or designed with this in mind.

Using Life Insurance as a Charitable Gift

One of the simplest ways is to ‘gift’ a life insurance policy. Doing so will mean that the charity receives the total amount of the policy proceeds upon the death of the holder, and further advantages are that it will substantially reduce estates taxes and income taxes. So the not-for-profit organization receives the full benefit of the policy.

Making the life insurance policy a gift will only cost slightly more for the holder (and the additional premium amount can be partly claimed back in tax over the ensuing years). Gifting a policy may be a good way of disbursing monies from a redundant life insurance policy; where the finance which was required and planned for when the policy was taken out is no longer needed.

(more…)