For most of us our home is the single largest investment we will ever have which is why we need a safety net for our partners and children who also depend on this investment. Mortgage life insurance is a life insurance policy which is designed to pay off the balance of the mortgage should the policy-holder die before the loan is paid off.

However recent figures from a survey undertaken by Sainsbury’s Life Insurance reveal that in the UK millions of borrowers (with billions of dollars worth of home loan debt between them) have failed to take out mortgage protection. In fact a staggering 43% of British mortgagees have no life cover. The recent recession has meant that UK borrowers, struggling to keep up with mounting debts, have cut back on life insurance cover.

A recent survey has shown that nearly a third of 35 to 44 year olds have no life insurance cover protecting their mortgage payments, and 34% of 45 to 54 year olds are in a similar situation. This means that many people with children are unprotected, as well as younger mortgage holders.

According to Lucy Hunter, at Sainsbury’s Life Insurance ‘Life insurance provides financial cover should the unthinkable happen, enabling people to be secure in the knowledge that their dependents could receive a cash lump sum if they were to die.”

This is particularly important for home owners who need to have the reassurance that, should the unthinkable happen, their families would be covered and able to continue living in the family home without the burden of financial responsibility – life insurance is basically ensuring financial security for the future.

Source: The Insurance Blogger.com November 2010.

photo credit: fourbyfourblazer

Certain female celebrities such as Courtney Cox Arquette, Madonna and perhaps most famously of all Demi Moore have been the envy of many women due to the fact they bagged themselves much younger husbands. However, new research puts a damper on their apparent good luck.

A study published in May 2010 in the journal “Demography” looked at data collected from over 2 million Danish couples. Statistics showed that women who married partners seven to nine years younger than themselves had an increased mortality rate of 20%.

The study, carried out by the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research in Rostock, Germany, found that women who marry considerably older men also tend to have shorter lives. A big age gap either way from a woman’s point of view has a detrimental effect on her life expectancy.

A woman’s best choice of partner for a long life is someone of the same age or slightly older.

Men who marry younger women are a much better risk to a life insurance company

This is not the case for men since the research showed that the mortality risk of a man who marries a woman seven to nine years younger than himself is reduced on average by 11%, compared to marrying someone the same age.

“Health Selection” doesn’t work for women

Previously it was thought that it was beneficial for either partner to marry a younger spouse.  This idea known as “health selection” says that those selecting younger partners are generally healthier and have the potential to live longer than others, and that by matching up with someone younger this would increase the positive psychological and social effects which help in older age.

Why don’t women  benefit from their younger husbands

According to researcher Sven Drefahl, “One of the few possible explanations is that couples with younger husbands violate social norms and thus suffer from social sanctions.” It is also believed that the psychological and social benefits an older husband gets from a younger wife do not hold true the other way round – the husband is unlikely to have as many social contacts as a woman would and is less likely to match a woman in terms of the level of care he will offer his ageing wife.

The good news is that life insurance for married couples is cheaper overall

The bright side is that marriage raises life expectancy for both sexes compared with the unmarried, with women overall still outliving men by a few years. This makes them more of a positive investment for a life insurance company when it comes to taking out a life insurance policy.

photo credit: jenny downing

According to a recent survey by the Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, based in New York, people aged 40 and under are opting for traditional whole life coverage rather than alternative forms of life coverage, in a bid to ensure their financial stability in the shorter term. The research showed that younger buyers are keen to pay off their policies within ten years or less, with 35% stating that they would rather meet financial obligations now than have to pay for it over their lifetime.

Limited Pay Policies Up By 152%

As Michael Ferik, Senior VP for independent life cover at Guardian Life, speaking at Guardian Whole Life International Forum on October 5 stated “This finding underscores a pronounced desire among Millenials and Gen Xers for financial security at an early age.” This research seems to be corroborated by the fact that sales of ‘limited pay’ life policies at Guardian life – policies which can be paid off over a shorter term, were up by a massive 152% year on year to June this year.

Young Life Policy Buyers Plan their Financial Futures

According to the Guardian survey, 74% of those aged 40 and under stated that they wanted to be more financially stable sooner rather than later, with 76% or respondents saying it was very important for them to be debt free in the near future. In contrast, those aged 40 or older attached less importance to having financial stability or leaving debts behind at 69% and 68% respectively. Mr Ferik believes this could be down to the heavy burden of student debt which younger people have had to deal with which has been reflected in a “desire to be debt free” rather than the more typical baby boomers who have more of a “live for today” attitude.

Protecting Families Number One Reason for Buying Life Insurance

The main reason given by the under 40′s for purchasing life insurance was to protect their families (72%) Those aged over 40 also gave this reason with 79% giving it as the driving motivation. Both age groups also counted the cash payout as the second biggest reason for taking out life coverage.

The results seem to indicate that younger buyers see whole life insurance as less of an ‘insurance product’ but rather as one of a number of assets which can be used to build a stable financial future. According to Ferik “They see whole life’s benefits for meeting unanticipated financial needs that arrive while still alive as better than borrowing from a 401K plan or – for now at least – betting on the stock market.”

Source: Insurancenewsnet.com

photo credit: faungg

A recent report shows there is a substantial gap between the amount of life insurance taken out by men and women who are married with children under 18. The research was carried out by MetLife in its annual ‘Study of Employee Benefit Trends‘ and it shows that working married men take out far more cover than their partners. Working dads take out an average of five times their earnings in life cover, while moms take out on average just three times their annual income.

The report was based on 382 interviews with working parents at companies who had at least two employees and was completed over the last quarter of 2009.

The Gap in Life Coverage is a ‘Worrying Trend’

According to Bill Rackzo vice president of US Business at MetLife this is a worrying trend since “Life Insurance can provide a family with substantial peace of mind. It is important to not only have coverage but to make sure coverage amounts are adequate. That is why it is concerning to see the income of working mothers is not as adequately protected as that of fathers.”

The gap in life coverage amounts is surprising given the survey also showed that both working moms and dads say they are concerned about not having enough life coverage, with six out of ten saying they felt ‘very’ concerned. So why are women not taking out enough life insurance? MetLife believes the reason may be down to poor communications from their employers about benefits – only 26% of working moms thought they were receiving adequate information compared to 46% of working dads.

(more…)

According to a recent report in The Lancet, men from Iceland have the longest life spans, with only 65 deaths per 1000 for men under the age of 60. Swaziland, on the other hand has the highest rate of mortality for younger men with a staggeringly high 756 in every 1,000 men dying before the age of 60. The recent study was carried out at the University of Seattle and the research team analyzed figures, which showed the rate of deaths in 187 countries from 1970 to 2010 in people aged 15 to 59.

Iceland leads in life expectancy.

Life Insurance Premiums Likely to Differ Depending on Location

The report showed that although the global mortality rate for adults has fallen by 1% a year for the past 40 years, the difference between the mortality rate of those countries with the highest and lowest rates is increasing. Substantial increases in adult mortality have been seen in the Sub Saharan Desert and in the Soviet Republic due to the Aids epidemic and a significant decline in mortality rates in South Asia. One implication of this new information is that people living in South Asia will be able to get lower Life Insurance premiums.

Individuals with Best Chance of Low Life Insurance premiums

The countries with the lowest mortality rates for men are: Iceland, Sweden, Malta, Netherlands, Switzerland, and Australia – in fact Australia’s mortality rate decreased dramatically from 44^th place in 1970 to 6^th in 2010. The UK came in at 19^th for mortality rates, Greece at 22^nd.

The report was bad news for the U.S. however, since mortality rates have increased for both men and women – with men dropping to 45^th place (170 deaths per 1000) and women to 49^th. This puts the U.S. way behind its neighbor, Canada whose mortality puts them in 28^th place – a statistic which some people may find surprising.

According to Dr Christopher Murray, author of the study, there may be good reasons for this “Part of it is that Canada is doing a much better job in tobacco than the United States.” Another factor is that Canada has universal health care and less incidence of so-called “affluence diseases” such as high blood pressure, diabetes, coronary heart disease and obesity, rates of which are increasing more rapidly in North America than in the developing nations.

Women of Cyprus have Best Chance of Longevity

For women the best place to live is Cyprus, followed by South Korea, Japan, Italy and Greece with Spain retaining a good rating (looks as though that Mediterranean diet pays off after all).

The adult mortality rate has big implications for public health globally and is listed as a Millennium Goal, but has been somewhat neglected until now. The latest research will also be useful for life insurance companies when it comes to underwriting policies in different countries.

Sources

Reuters

Huffington Post