There are basically two types of life insurance policy available known as ‘whole life’ and ‘term’. Whole life policies are there to provide benefits to the owners throughout their entire lives, whereas ‘term’ policies are taken out to provide coverage for a set period of years.

Life insurance needs should be re-assessed at regular intervals to ensure the policy or policies taken out are still adequate for their purpose. Policies taken out 10 -15 years ago may have outlived their use, lapsed, or premiums may have gone up due to underperformance in a volatile market place. Examples of underperformers include many of the ‘permanent’ life policies available over recent years –‘whole life’, ‘universal’ and ‘variable’ life policies which are linked to interest rates, which can go up as well as down.

No ‘One size fits all’ Life Insurance Policy

There is no ‘one size fits all’ insurance policy out there and it may be a case of combining different types of life coverage in order to ensure future financial needs will be met. Many people decide to re-assess their requirements for life insurance after experiencing a big life change which affects their finances – such as having a baby, or taking out a mortgage. The implication of leaving behind dependents or partners who may be left with big financial commitments motivates many to plan a financial future which includes life cover.

As well as meeting the needs of their beneficiaries in their ongoing lives, another common reason to take out coverage could be simply to cover short term funeral costs (costs which are rising every year).

How to calculate life insurance requirements

An appraisal is needed as to how any current policies are performing, and an honest calculation of their projected value going forward is needed. You may find that there are better products out there in the marketplace to suit you. Restructuring may seem like a hassle, but lower administrative fees and the fact that insurance companies have re-designed their cost structures mean that changing policies is not the financial headache it used to be.

Alternatively – you may discover through the process of re-evaluation that your life coverage is just fine, thank you – but taking stock of finances in an uncertain economic climate has to be a good thing.

Source: Stephen Smith, Delmarvanow.com

 photo credit: SMJJP

According to the Population Reference Bureau[1] the number of single moms in the US has risen dramatically over the last 40 years. In 2009 a massive 18.1 million children were categorized as living in single-mother households (a single mother household is one in which a family is headed by a female with no spouse present). Although children brought up in single-parent households can and do succeed many are hampered by poverty, and have an increased risk of dropping out of school or becoming teen parents.

Majority of Single Mothers have no Life Insurance

Having sole responsibility for the children means single mothers must consider the welfare of the kids in the event of their death – a necessary (albeit unpleasant) task you might think, but worryingly estimates show that almost four in ten single parents do not have any life insurance cover – and those who do have often not arranged enough.

Single moms must make life insurance a priority so that their children do not suffer financially as well as emotionally should the unthinkable happen– their Life Cover must ensure sufficient resources for children to live on as well as perhaps the opportunity to go to college later on. Life insurance which would pay out on the death of the policy holder (term insurance) might be a good option to consider, however it’s worth discussing possibilities with a good insurance agent who will be able to give an expert opinion on the best low-cost life insurance policies for those on a low income.

Obama aims to get Single Moms back to school

In an attempt to lift single mothers out of poverty Barack Obama is attempting to make prospects better for single moms who want to return to study but are hampered by lack of finances. Grants are available to enable single mothers to get a second chance at education – education which can only benefit both their families and their future employers.

The Scholarships for Moms program has increased funding via Pell Grants ,which have been around for some time – the maximum amount of aid has been increased to over $5000 –$1000 more than previously. Also importantly the range of study options for which funding is available has increased to cover part-time and distance study, thereby making it far easier for a single mother to access learning whilst working or caring for children. A further $10,000 worth of financial aid via a Scholarship is available for some single mothers – in order to qualify you must be female and have a child.

The Obama Scholarships give single moms a real chance at improving prospects both for themselves and their children – but they must also consider how important life insurance is to their offspring’s potential happiness and security.

photo credit: meemal

According to a recent survey by the Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, based in New York, people aged 40 and under are opting for traditional whole life coverage rather than alternative forms of life coverage, in a bid to ensure their financial stability in the shorter term. The research showed that younger buyers are keen to pay off their policies within ten years or less, with 35% stating that they would rather meet financial obligations now than have to pay for it over their lifetime.

Limited Pay Policies Up By 152%

As Michael Ferik, Senior VP for independent life cover at Guardian Life, speaking at Guardian Whole Life International Forum on October 5 stated “This finding underscores a pronounced desire among Millenials and Gen Xers for financial security at an early age.” This research seems to be corroborated by the fact that sales of ‘limited pay’ life policies at Guardian life – policies which can be paid off over a shorter term, were up by a massive 152% year on year to June this year.

Young Life Policy Buyers Plan their Financial Futures

According to the Guardian survey, 74% of those aged 40 and under stated that they wanted to be more financially stable sooner rather than later, with 76% or respondents saying it was very important for them to be debt free in the near future. In contrast, those aged 40 or older attached less importance to having financial stability or leaving debts behind at 69% and 68% respectively. Mr Ferik believes this could be down to the heavy burden of student debt which younger people have had to deal with which has been reflected in a “desire to be debt free” rather than the more typical baby boomers who have more of a “live for today” attitude.

Protecting Families Number One Reason for Buying Life Insurance

The main reason given by the under 40′s for purchasing life insurance was to protect their families (72%) Those aged over 40 also gave this reason with 79% giving it as the driving motivation. Both age groups also counted the cash payout as the second biggest reason for taking out life coverage.

The results seem to indicate that younger buyers see whole life insurance as less of an ‘insurance product’ but rather as one of a number of assets which can be used to build a stable financial future. According to Ferik “They see whole life’s benefits for meeting unanticipated financial needs that arrive while still alive as better than borrowing from a 401K plan or – for now at least – betting on the stock market.”

Source: Insurancenewsnet.com

photo credit: faungg

A recent report shows there is a substantial gap between the amount of life insurance taken out by men and women who are married with children under 18. The research was carried out by MetLife in its annual ‘Study of Employee Benefit Trends‘ and it shows that working married men take out far more cover than their partners. Working dads take out an average of five times their earnings in life cover, while moms take out on average just three times their annual income.

The report was based on 382 interviews with working parents at companies who had at least two employees and was completed over the last quarter of 2009.

The Gap in Life Coverage is a ‘Worrying Trend’

According to Bill Rackzo vice president of US Business at MetLife this is a worrying trend since “Life Insurance can provide a family with substantial peace of mind. It is important to not only have coverage but to make sure coverage amounts are adequate. That is why it is concerning to see the income of working mothers is not as adequately protected as that of fathers.”

The gap in life coverage amounts is surprising given the survey also showed that both working moms and dads say they are concerned about not having enough life coverage, with six out of ten saying they felt ‘very’ concerned. So why are women not taking out enough life insurance? MetLife believes the reason may be down to poor communications from their employers about benefits – only 26% of working moms thought they were receiving adequate information compared to 46% of working dads.

(more…)

The recent recession has led to a U.S. public that is more cautious about its spending habits. In many ways, this is a good thing – people are saving more and spending less. However, the unwanted knock-on effect of this uncertainty about finances is that ownership of life insurance has hit an all time low, according to NYSE: Unum (one of the world’s largest insurers).

This is unfortunate because as Debbie Cecil, director of life products at Unum says “Life Insurance is one of the building blocks of a solid financial plan.” But due to the economy “many people are just turning away from pursuing this type of coverage.”

U.S. Public has put Life Insurance on the Back Burner

Also, according to financial services consulting and research firm LIMRA the reason more than 40% of Americans have not bought a life insurance policy  is that other priorities such as paying off debt or saving for retirement have become top of the list. This is why 11 million fewer American households are covered by life insurance than six years ago.

(more…)